<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Civil Engineering Photos - Latest Comments</title><link>http://ceephotos.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ceephotos.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 15:11:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ADA Sidewalk Ramp</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/06/16/ada-sidewalk-ramp/#comment-2038020104</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd use a different photo as the location of the detectable warning pavers is out of spec. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Infrastructure guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 15:11:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Broad Crested Weir</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2012/01/30/broad-crested-weir-2/#comment-1424210294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great picture!  How do I obtain permission to use it in an article I'm writing?  Pbaker@ivyautomation.com&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Baker</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 13:06:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bridge Pier Cofferdam</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/09/01/bridge-pier-cofferdam/#comment-1235013482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Shouldn't the sheet piled be seal-welded at the joints to create the idea of s water tight structure ???&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calixte Abdias</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:23:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Olympus Dam, Estes Park, Colorado &amp;#8211; Flood Control, Power Generation</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2012/02/06/olympus-dam-estes-park-colorado-flood-control-power-generation/#comment-1115381842</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As you will read in the article, there are questions being raised about the Dam's roll in the recent flooding down the Big Thompson canyon.  The Bureau of Reclamation officer made the comments in response to those concerns.  I happened upon your photo as part of a google search and thought I would mention it.  I think the comment by the officer is largely true because the dam is part of the Colorado-Big Thompson water diversion project.  But it's also possible that flood control was thrown in originally.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebf</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 08:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Olympus Dam, Estes Park, Colorado &amp;#8211; Flood Control, Power Generation</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2012/02/06/olympus-dam-estes-park-colorado-flood-control-power-generation/#comment-1114032679</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comment and correction davebf.  We'll get that fixed right away!  I read what I wrote down somewhere, but I can't find the resource as it was a few years ago. It seems the  public affairs spokesperson for the Bureau of Reclamation's Great Plains office is a good source.  I wonder where the source I was reading got their information?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Mead</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:49:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Olympus Dam, Estes Park, Colorado &amp;#8211; Flood Control, Power Generation</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2012/02/06/olympus-dam-estes-park-colorado-flood-control-power-generation/#comment-1113914105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You might want to check out this article:&lt;a href="http://www.eptrail.com/estes-park-news/ci_24314979/olympus-dam-doing-its-job" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.eptrail.com/estes-park-news/ci_24314979/olympus-dam-doing-its-job"&gt;http://www.eptrail.com/este...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Olympus Dam holds back the water in Lake Estes. Lake Estes is not a flood control reservoir, nor was it built for storage. Lake Estes is a regulatory reservoir. It was built to help regulate hydro-power generation."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebf</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:13:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Olympus Dam, Estes Park, Colorado &amp;#8211; Flood Control, Power Generation</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2012/02/06/olympus-dam-estes-park-colorado-flood-control-power-generation/#comment-1054701670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;É bom produz energia elétrica,mas causa açoriamento na cabeçeira do rio.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mauricio Florez Chaves</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2013 08:08:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pedestrian Tunnel</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/06/28/pedestrian-tunnel/#comment-1054696392</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sençacional.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mauricio Florez Chaves</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2013 08:03:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mountain Dam</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/10/31/mountain-dam/#comment-1005807051</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a link to a photo of the replica Idylwilde Dam:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22133775/dam.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22133775/dam.jpg"&gt;https://dl.dropboxuserconte...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It has some selective compression to fit the actual layout space. Also, the area is not mountainous where is sits on the layout (pay no attention to the fact that there are also rails going along side the water...).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mark A. Baczkowski worked with me to create it based upon several pictures of it we found on the internet and from satellite images. I think it came out pretty nicely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Todd Clayton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2013 17:12:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mountain Dam</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/10/31/mountain-dam/#comment-856297122</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! Sounds good. It will be some time, but I will definitely send the photo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Todd Clayton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 07:56:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mountain Dam</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/10/31/mountain-dam/#comment-855679362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Laugh?!  I run a civil engineering photo site, I think it's awesome! :)  Maybe you can send a photo to us and we can put it on the site when you are done&lt;br&gt;Alex&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Mead</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 20:03:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mountain Dam</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/10/31/mountain-dam/#comment-855354760</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. Thanks very much for the info. Don't laugh, but I'm trying to model the region on a model railroad. I liked the look of this one over Olympus Dam (although that one makes more sense for the area I'm modeling). I think this will be slightly easier to model as well. I really appreciate it! I love the Estes Park area.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Todd Clayton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:52:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mountain Dam</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/10/31/mountain-dam/#comment-854717591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Todd,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comment. I took this photo when I was in Colorado two summer ago driving to Estes Park.  I did a little research for you though and that dam is the Idylewidle Dam on the Big Thompson River.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What's your project about?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Mead</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 21:25:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mountain Dam</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/10/31/mountain-dam/#comment-854700451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, I came across this image looking for images of dams near Estes Park. I would like to find more images of this dam. Do you know the name or can I get information on the location of the dam? I'm having trouble locating it. Thanks very much.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Todd Clayton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 20:41:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Roller Support</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/09/23/roller-support/#comment-759286599</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes thanks &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karma</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:26:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Viaduto do Corgo Bridge, Portugal</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2012/06/15/viaduto-do-corgo-bridge-portugal/#comment-651262481</link><description>&lt;p&gt;More photos :&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Viaduto-do-Corgo-Auto-Estrada-Transmontana/166987403337099" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Viaduto-do-Corgo-Auto-Estrada-Transmontana/166987403337099"&gt;http://www.facebook.com/pag...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Davide Borges</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 05:21:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dynamic Pile Testing</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2012/04/05/dynamic-pile-testing/#comment-488649027</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is a much faster test to run. Dynamic testing takes as long as it does to drive a pile so maybe 30-60 minutes/pile. A static load test can take 4-8 hours to set-up and complete. On the other hand Static Load test is still the industry standard and thusly a dynamic pile test program has to test usually twice as many piles. Don't quote me on this but I believe the Factor of Safety for driven piles with 1% of all piles being static load tested is 2.0. While for a high-strain dynamic test on 2% of all piles is 2.25. You'll get to learn a lot more about this I'm sure because G2 does high-strain dynamic testing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 06:45:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dynamic Pile Testing</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2012/04/05/dynamic-pile-testing/#comment-487658433</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does dynamic pile testing offer any benefits when compared to full scale static load tests? Any disadvantages?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake Clay</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:00:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Roller Support</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/09/23/roller-support/#comment-455907315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this picture ,Our master at Fasa University told us last week to find some photos from supports as a Homework.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Soheil Salimi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 09:05:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Railroad Embankment Failure</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/06/30/railroad-embankment-failure/#comment-442463293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Most of the information I got here was from various articles on &lt;a href="http://AnnArbor.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="AnnArbor.com"&gt;AnnArbor.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;There may have been a few small details I included that I got from some worker at the site who was making sure people weren't wondering too close because it would have been dangerous (there where some utility poles with live electricity that where barely in the ground - see utility pole in middle of photo).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's cool that you're involved in a semester long project on this local disaster.  Hope it turns out well for you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karl Jansen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:46:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Railroad Embankment Failure</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/06/30/railroad-embankment-failure/#comment-442143133</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Karl, this failure is the subject of a semester long project for me in the Civil Department at U of M. And I was wondering if you had sources for the information you present here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake Clay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:25:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Collapsed Building Port-au-Prince, Haiti</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2012/01/17/collapsed-building-port-au-prince-haiti/#comment-420363084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It probably would not have failed is my guess.  It was standing fine during normal loading but the large increase in energy delivered to the building during the earthquake is what took it down.  Another large energy event also could have taken it down, such as very large wind loads, an explosion, or perhaps a runaway vehicle.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex R Mead</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:33:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Collapsed Building Port-au-Prince, Haiti</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2012/01/17/collapsed-building-port-au-prince-haiti/#comment-419930258</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If this building were not subjected to an earthquake load would it have failed, or is it because of the earthquakes loads that this building failed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake Clay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:47:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fire Hydrant Drinking Fountain</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/09/26/fire-hydrant-drinking-fountain/#comment-391873582</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Claudius,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah I think the reason it looks clumsy is two fold.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One, that cage near the hydrant is a covering a back flow preventer. This is a connection piece that ensures no water, and more importantly crap that water contians, flows back into the water distribution system.  If pollutants got in there it would be a big issue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Two, I believe the rack has an additional filter, perhaps to remove any final taste, just because it is for drinking purposes.  The water is definitely safe to drink right out of the hydrant, but many people like additional filtering for taste reasons, or paranoia :).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex R Mead</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:06:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flared Concrete Column</title><link>http://ceephotos.karcor.com/2011/12/19/flared-concrete-column/#comment-390897904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, it would be part of any structural analysis.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex R Mead</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:18:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>